Anesthesia revenue streams are an attractive target for investors of various stripes. Across the country, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and certain medical specialty groups are looking at beefing up their incomes by sharing in anesthesia profits. At the January 24-26, 2013 ASA Practice Management Conference, Judith Jurin Semo, Esq., who presented an Update on the Company Model, noted that trade press articles encouraging such ventures appear regularly, going back at least to 2004 (Outpatient Surgery).  The “company model” arrangement, which allows a third party to use an intermediate corporation to collect the professional fees while paying the anesthesiologists a negotiated rate, has been the object of considerable concern on the part of the ASA and the anesthesia community at large.  Polled informally, one-third of anesthesiologists report having been approached about participating in a company model. The company model is becoming familiar, but is it legal? The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute The chief...

  A moderated discussion of compensation strategies at last week’s MGMA-ACMPE AAA meeting showed a good deal of flexibility in allowing anesthesiologists to job-share or otherwise to reduce their hours. The groups represented at the discussion were also creative in compensating members for business development and administrative activities. If case loads decline substantially, layoffs may occur, although they are the least favorite option.Along with more than 300 other MGMA-ACMPE Anesthesia Administration Assembly (AAA) members and exhibitors, we participated in the annual AAA meeting in Scottsdale last week.  One breakout session discussion group in particular was so informative that we obtained permission to bring a summary to our readers.About 60 individuals attended the discussion of compensation strategies moderated by Stephen E. Comess, Executive Director, United Anesthesia Services, P.C.  Mr. Comess got the ball rolling on responses to twelve prepared compensation management scenario questions by giving each member of the audience a playing...

From time to time anesthesia groups find that they need to reassess their administration or decision-making processes. This can involve everything from tinkering with how routine day-to-day administrative activities are carried out, to totally revamping the group’s governance structure.Reassessments can come about for a variety of reasons. There may have been a significant growth in the number of physicians or CRNAs, or an increase in the number of practice locations. The group may have encountered internal strife without adequate governance systems in place. The group may find itself incapable of making decisions or reaching consensus in a timely or efficient manner. A group may have relied too heavily upon busy physicians to carry out non-clinical duties, or one physician may (by choice or otherwise) be overburdened with administrative responsibilities.Issues in a Small Group. One of the assumed advantages of a smaller group is that it can function in a “more efficient” manner....

On August 22, 2011, as a result of a directive from President Obama, the US Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued its Plan for Retrospective Review of Existing Rules (“Plan”). The Plan includes a review from all HHS operating and staff divisions (e.g., the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”)) that establish, administer and/or enforce regulation. HHS’ Plan aims to review “existing significant regulations to identify those rules that can be eliminated as obsolete, unnecessary, burdensome, or counterproductive or that can be modified to be more effective, efficient, flexible, and streamlined.” While, on its face, a review of unnecessary regulations appears to be beneficial, looking below the surface reveals that the review may create fundamental changes in medical and anesthesia practice. CMS is contemplating reviewing the conditions of participation (“CoPs”) for anesthesia services (42 CFR 482.52) to eliminate the certified registered nurse anesthetist (“CRNA”) supervision requirement, which could...