Consolidation in the hospital sector has proceeded at a rapid pace in the last few years.  Hospitals, like anesthesiologists and other health care professionals and organizations, are seeking the advantages of combined size to secure their future in a marketplace undergoing a revolution with an unknown outcome.  Oral argument before the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, discussed in our Alert of April 2nd, did nothing to mitigate the uncertainty. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) scored a significant victory last week when a federal District Court judge in Rockford, Illinois halted the acquisition of Rockford Health System by a competitor, OSF Healthcare System, until the FTC can conclude an administrative review of the deal (including all appeals, which means a delay of at least a year even if the hospitals ultimately prevail). According to the FTC, the acquisition would violate antitrust law by reducing competition in...

The variety of commonly used modalities for the management of post-operative surgical pain makes it imperative that practitioners understand the specific documentation and billing requirements of each option. Listed below are the five most common approaches and their corresponding claims submission guidelines. As is always the case, reimbursement will vary by payer.Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Management (IV PCA) – Surgeons are reimbursed for routine post-operative pain management as part of their global fee. Due to this fact, Medicare does not allow anesthesiologists to bill for this service. However, many non-Medicare payers do. The physician must see the patient on a post-operative day and document a progress note to include a problem focused history and exam with straightforward medical decision making. The typical code billed for this service is “subsequent inpatient visit” code 99231 (2 units).Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) – If an epidural is placed for post-op pain and is not the...

The United States Supreme Court allocated more time to oral argument on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) last week than it had to any other case in the past 50 years.  Four distinct questions were before the Court during six hours of argument spread over three days.  In chronological order of consideration, these questions were: Does the 1867 Anti-Injunction Act, which bars pre-enforcement litigation over a tax, prevent the Court from hearing the challenge to the insurance mandate? Can Congress compel individuals to buy insurance or pay a penalty (the “individual mandate”)? Can the rest of the ACA survive if the individual mandate is struck down? Can Congress pressure states to expand Medicaid coverage by threatening to withhold funds?The Individual MandateThe room was packed and buzzing with excitement.  Some people clearly had slept outside last night.  Even some of the attorneys general from the challenger states had to...

From time to time anesthesia groups find that they need to reassess their administration or decision-making processes. This can involve everything from tinkering with how routine day-to-day administrative activities are carried out, to totally revamping the group’s governance structure.Reassessments can come about for a variety of reasons. There may have been a significant growth in the number of physicians or CRNAs, or an increase in the number of practice locations. The group may have encountered internal strife without adequate governance systems in place. The group may find itself incapable of making decisions or reaching consensus in a timely or efficient manner. A group may have relied too heavily upon busy physicians to carry out non-clinical duties, or one physician may (by choice or otherwise) be overburdened with administrative responsibilities.Issues in a Small Group. One of the assumed advantages of a smaller group is that it can function in a “more efficient” manner....

Anesthesia is the quintessential service specialty. Establishing and maintaining a consistently strong  relationship with a hospital, a clinic or an ASC is no easier for an anesthesia group practice than for any other type of service provider, be it car mechanic, internet provider or hair stylist; today’s medical consumers know they have options that give them leverage in demanding services and loyalty. For too many anesthesia practices this is a relatively new and somewhat disconcerting state of affairs. Anesthesia vulnerability to replacement has grown in direct proportion to the amount of financial support provided by the facility; practices that receive no subsidy support clearly have the strongest support, at least to the extent that they provide quality care. Competition for anesthesia contracts has ushered in a new era of service expectations and changed the perception of the role of the specialty in the facility. Quite simply consistently good outcomes are simply...

WHY FEDERAL INSURANCE REGULATION?Normally, insurance companies are regulated by the states. As a result there are hundreds of statutes and rules affecting companies that operate in multiple states. The National Association of Insurance ComNAIC, missioners (NAIC) issues guidance to standardize insurance laws, but states are not required to follow its recommendations. As might be expected this results in increased costs as companies design multiple products to comply with diverse and sometimes conflicting state regulations and formalities.For the most part the Federal Government has not interfered in state insurance laws, leaving the regulation of the industry to state regulators. Non interference has worked adequately during soft markets in which insurance is easy to find.IMPACT OF A “HARD MARKET”During “hard” markets in which insurance coverage is difficult to obtain, the federal government has stepped in to allow an insurance company to operate in many states as long as one state agrees to license...

On August 22, 2011, as a result of a directive from President Obama, the US Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued its Plan for Retrospective Review of Existing Rules (“Plan”). The Plan includes a review from all HHS operating and staff divisions (e.g., the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”)) that establish, administer and/or enforce regulation. HHS’ Plan aims to review “existing significant regulations to identify those rules that can be eliminated as obsolete, unnecessary, burdensome, or counterproductive or that can be modified to be more effective, efficient, flexible, and streamlined.” While, on its face, a review of unnecessary regulations appears to be beneficial, looking below the surface reveals that the review may create fundamental changes in medical and anesthesia practice. CMS is contemplating reviewing the conditions of participation (“CoPs”) for anesthesia services (42 CFR 482.52) to eliminate the certified registered nurse anesthetist (“CRNA”) supervision requirement, which could...