The EHR Incentive Program, often dubbed “Meaningful Use” (MU), has been surrounded by questions and confusion among anesthesiologists and practice administrators since its inception.  Currently, the majority of anesthesiologists and pain physicians are classified as an Eligible Professional (EP) under the Medicare portion of Meaningful Use and most of the public conversation is centered on that program.  However, the Medicaid option offers more flexibility and financial incentive which raises the question, “How does the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program differ from the Medicare portion?”  The major differences between the Medicare and Medicaid programs of Meaningful Use center on:Provider EligibilityProvider EnrollmentFinancial IncentiveAttestation ScheduleProvider Enrollment and Eligibility To be considered a Medicaid EP, an anesthesiologist or pain physician must perform less than 90% of their services in an inpatient setting (POS 21), but also must provide at least 30% of services to Medicaid patients.  According to CMS: Medicaid patients might be fee-for-service encounters where...

  A moderated discussion of compensation strategies at last week’s MGMA-ACMPE AAA meeting showed a good deal of flexibility in allowing anesthesiologists to job-share or otherwise to reduce their hours. The groups represented at the discussion were also creative in compensating members for business development and administrative activities. If case loads decline substantially, layoffs may occur, although they are the least favorite option.Along with more than 300 other MGMA-ACMPE Anesthesia Administration Assembly (AAA) members and exhibitors, we participated in the annual AAA meeting in Scottsdale last week.  One breakout session discussion group in particular was so informative that we obtained permission to bring a summary to our readers.About 60 individuals attended the discussion of compensation strategies moderated by Stephen E. Comess, Executive Director, United Anesthesia Services, P.C.  Mr. Comess got the ball rolling on responses to twelve prepared compensation management scenario questions by giving each member of the audience a playing...

Consolidation in the hospital sector has proceeded at a rapid pace in the last few years.  Hospitals, like anesthesiologists and other health care professionals and organizations, are seeking the advantages of combined size to secure their future in a marketplace undergoing a revolution with an unknown outcome.  Oral argument before the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, discussed in our Alert of April 2nd, did nothing to mitigate the uncertainty. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) scored a significant victory last week when a federal District Court judge in Rockford, Illinois halted the acquisition of Rockford Health System by a competitor, OSF Healthcare System, until the FTC can conclude an administrative review of the deal (including all appeals, which means a delay of at least a year even if the hospitals ultimately prevail). According to the FTC, the acquisition would violate antitrust law by reducing competition in...

The variety of commonly used modalities for the management of post-operative surgical pain makes it imperative that practitioners understand the specific documentation and billing requirements of each option. Listed below are the five most common approaches and their corresponding claims submission guidelines. As is always the case, reimbursement will vary by payer.Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Management (IV PCA) – Surgeons are reimbursed for routine post-operative pain management as part of their global fee. Due to this fact, Medicare does not allow anesthesiologists to bill for this service. However, many non-Medicare payers do. The physician must see the patient on a post-operative day and document a progress note to include a problem focused history and exam with straightforward medical decision making. The typical code billed for this service is “subsequent inpatient visit” code 99231 (2 units).Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) – If an epidural is placed for post-op pain and is not the...

The United States Supreme Court allocated more time to oral argument on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) last week than it had to any other case in the past 50 years.  Four distinct questions were before the Court during six hours of argument spread over three days.  In chronological order of consideration, these questions were: Does the 1867 Anti-Injunction Act, which bars pre-enforcement litigation over a tax, prevent the Court from hearing the challenge to the insurance mandate? Can Congress compel individuals to buy insurance or pay a penalty (the “individual mandate”)? Can the rest of the ACA survive if the individual mandate is struck down? Can Congress pressure states to expand Medicaid coverage by threatening to withhold funds?The Individual MandateThe room was packed and buzzing with excitement.  Some people clearly had slept outside last night.  Even some of the attorneys general from the challenger states had to...

From time to time anesthesia groups find that they need to reassess their administration or decision-making processes. This can involve everything from tinkering with how routine day-to-day administrative activities are carried out, to totally revamping the group’s governance structure.Reassessments can come about for a variety of reasons. There may have been a significant growth in the number of physicians or CRNAs, or an increase in the number of practice locations. The group may have encountered internal strife without adequate governance systems in place. The group may find itself incapable of making decisions or reaching consensus in a timely or efficient manner. A group may have relied too heavily upon busy physicians to carry out non-clinical duties, or one physician may (by choice or otherwise) be overburdened with administrative responsibilities.Issues in a Small Group. One of the assumed advantages of a smaller group is that it can function in a “more efficient” manner....

For the last several months the literature on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) has flourished. So has the volume of workshops, seminars and webinars, all with the intent of educating providers on what the future will look like, and many addressing how physicians might participate. Independent anesthesia groups are trying to not only understand the ACO rules but are also working hard to determine how they will function in any of the possible structures that emerge in their communities.There are various traditional obstacles to the formation of multispecialty groups, such as those posed by the antitrust and antikickback laws.    The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act calls upon the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to adopt regulations that will foster the development of ACOs, and that includes resolving potential conflicts between the antitrust, antikickback and Stark laws and the efficiencies expected to result from the formation of ACOs.Given that...

In any financial transaction, the person holding the money is at an advantage.  Getting money back from someone who should not have been paid is harder than not making the payment in the first place.   CMS knows this, and that is why it is placing a new emphasis on prepayment review of claims.  Originally slated to begin on January 1, 2012 the prepayment review initiative will now formally launch in June.  The number of prepayment reviews is going to increase from 1.2 million to 2.7 million claims per year. There is a large amount of taxpayer dollars at stake.  In 2011, the Medicare fee-for-service improper payment rate was 8.6 percent, or $28.8 billion in estimated erroneous claims payments.  Medicaid adds another $21.9 billion.  During 2011, CMS recovered $5.6 billion in fraudulent payments, an increase of 167 percent over 2008. The increase in recoveries is attributable in major part to the $350...