There continues to be considerable confusion as to which post operative pain management services are reimbursable and the criteria for ensuring that payment for them can be consistently obtained. Part of the issue has to do with the different modes of acute pain management currently being used across the country, but another point of confusion pertains to the provider categories for each type of service. While individual payor policies may vary, the essential parameters are quite consistent across all jurisdictions.  Irrespective of what a particular group’s billing practices have been historically, it is a good time to reexamine previous assumptions and review current guidelines. The fact that a given payor has not questioned charges for a particular service historically is no guarantee that payments were received legitimately or that a subsequent audit might not uncover a significant overpayment. It should be noted that contract terms can be misleading; and all terms...