Print

December 6, 2010

The suspense over whether Congress will allow the automatic 25 percent reduction in Medicare payments to physicians on January 1st increases within the larger economic context. Will the federal government find a way to put people back to work? Will taxes for those making $250,000 or more go up next year? Will the health care reform changes survive the new Congressional majority’s promises to repeal or at least withhold the funds needed for implementation? We don’t have any better answers than others, but a summary of the data will help inform the debates we are inevitably going to be having with family members and friends during the holiday festivities.

Medicare Physician Payment Cuts

First, Medicare payments will continue at their present levels through December.  A week ago, on December 29, the House of Representatives approved by voice vote the bill passed by the Senate before Thanksgiving, thus postponing a 23 percent cut in payments to physicians scheduled to take effect on December 1st. President Obama signed the bill the next day. The one-month postponement will cost $1 billion, paid for with savings from planned cuts in Medicare reimbursement for therapy services, according to the agreement made by Sens. Max Baucus (D-MT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA).

ASA, the AMA, the American College of Surgeons and other medical organizations are working hard to bring about a further delay in any cuts until the end of 2012. That would cost about $17 billion. As the Congressional action protecting current levels through December shows, Congress is serious about finding the funds within the Medicare budget itself rather than taking them from other governmental programs. The White House, however, is pushing Congress to adopt the one-year payment fix. While there is bipartisan support in the House, all Senate Republicans have committed to blocking any bill if they cannot reach agreement with the Democrats on tax cut issues.

Data Points for Your Discussions (and Slides!)

  1. Number of uninsured adults (age 18 to 64), millions

    2008

    2009

    2010

    56.4

    58.7

    59.1

    Source:  CDC, MMWR, Vital Signs: Health Insurance Coverage and Health Care Utilization --- United States, 2006--2009 and January--March 2010.  November 12, 2010 / 59(44); 1448-1454

  2. National Health Expenditure Data (NHE)

    Historical NHE, 2008:

Projected NHE, 2009-2019:

  1. Medicare Program Expenditures and Growth
  1. Anesthesia Proportion of Total Medicare Spending on Physician Services

    (Column B. “Total Physicians,” is a subset of “Total All Specialties.”  The percentage for “All Specialties’” is 100 %.)  

    2008

    A.  Anesthesiology

    B.  Total Physicians

     

    Submitted

    Allowed

    Submitted

    Allowed

    Charges
    x 1,000

    $9,016,140

    $1,794,235

    $274,355,179

    $113,804,294

    Percent

    3.3%

    1.6%

    72.2%

    71.9%

    Per Person
    Served

    $1,589

    $316

    $6,336

    $2,616


    Anesthesiology thus accounts for about 1.6 percent of Medicare Part B spending on all physician services, a figure that has been reasonably consistent for at least two decades.  That percent figure explains both why anesthesiology does not command more attention and – given the absolute total dollars involved – why it has been so difficult to raise the anesthesia conversion factor. 

    The disparity between submitted and allowed charges is twice as large (503 percent) for anesthesiology as it is for total physician services (242 percent).  Looking at the data for other specialties in the full table from which the above values were taken will help in understanding the apparent anomaly.

    Source:  CMS, Medicare & Medicaid Statistical Supplement, 2009 Edition:  Table 9.5, Persons Served, Services, Submitted and Allowed Charges, Program Payments, and Balance Billing for Medicare Physician and Supplier Services, by Physician Specialty: Calendar Year 2008

  1. Anesthesiologist Compensation, 2010
  1. Proposals to Rein in Health Care Costs

    This Alert does not address the causes or amounts of likely further growth in health care spending.  (Thomson Reuters’ White Paper “A Path to Eliminating $3.6 Trillion in Wasteful Healthcare Spending” is one good source of information on that topic.)  At the moment it is more interesting to consider some of the health care savings proposals from President Obama’s deficit commission.  These, according to the Associated Press, make “cost curbs in the new overhaul law [ACA] look tame by comparison.”

All of the data provided above is just a smattering of the credible health policy materials available on the Internet. We hope that it is enough to answer some of the questions that our readers will have. Please let us know whether this type of review is useful to you.

With best wishes,

Tony Mira
President and CEO