Benjamin Franklin said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” It is certain that Mr. Franklin was not speaking about the value of preemptive compliance work, yet the old adage aptly applies to the work done by physician groups to prevent allegations of fraud or abuse. The Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) recently reported that the government expected to set a record of $6.9 billion in recoveries from its investigations and enforcement actions for its fiscal year 2012.1 As the chart in Figure 1 shows2, this $6.9 billion is part of a trend of continuously increasing recoveries. For this reason, many physician groups have implemented compliance programs designed to minimize the chances that the group will commit what the government perceives to be fraud or abuse. One key to effective compliance is an understanding of those issues of particular importance...

The anesthesia business, regardless of whether one chooses to define it as the practice of medicine, nursing, or some hybrid, is in the midst of upheaval. Increasing market consolidation, mergers, acquisitions and introduction of private equity funding have made the business of managing anesthesia delivery services increasingly complex. Bear in mind that delivering anesthesia and managing the delivery of anesthesia services are two very different things. Our unparalleled improvements in patient safety, quality, and, ultimately, morbidity and mortality make us justifiably proud of the specialty’s success and the envy of the rest of health care. One would think that this remarkable history of clinical success would provide stability for the business side of anesthesia practice. After all, the clinical product that we provide is orders of magnitude safer than when I entered the specialty 25 years ago. If anything, however, I believe our advances have actually laid the foundation for the...

  Part I of this survey (Alabama-Missouri) appeared in the Fall 2012 issue of the Communiqué. In Part II, we summarize the laws and regulations that require health plans to pay claims within a given period in the remaining states (Montana-Wyoming), as well as the penalties for violations.        

“Much has changed in health care since HIPAA was enacted over fifteen years ago,” said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in the Department of Health and Human Services’ January 17th press release announcing the publication of the long-awaited final omnibus rule with Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement and Breach Notification Rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. “The new rule will help protect patient privacy and safeguard patients’ health information in an ever expanding digital age.” The final omnibus rule will go into effect on March 26, 2013. Covered entities such as anesthesia and pain medicine practices and billing companies including ABC—and their business associates—must be in compliance by September 23, 2013. The final rule changes HIPAA in several important ways: It toughens the definition and consequences of failure to notify affected parties of security and privacy breaches;It strengthens...

The 2013 CPT® Changes and Codebook are now available to health care providers.  Overall, the 2013 changes include 186 new codes, 119 deleted codes, and 263 revised codes. In addition CPT revised 18 modifiers and updated 150 guidelines.  The very good news for anesthesia and pain management providers is only a small handful of these changes directly impact the services they routinely provide.  Following are general comments regarding the 2013 changes: No Anesthesia codes were deleted, revised, or added for 2013.Pain management providers should take note of the four revised codes and one new code in the nervous system section of CPT 2013. The majority of changes occur in the denervation subsection, where CPT revised codes 64612 and 64614 and added 64615 for bilateral chemodenervation of muscles innervated by the facial, trigeminal, cervical spinal and accessory nerves.CPT also changed the parenthetical note for code 76942, ultrasound guidance for needle placement (eg,...

  With the ever-rising cost of healthcare, all parties are looking for ways to finance it. From high deductible health plans with savings components to consumer credit tools such as credit cards and loans, the face of healthcare financing is changing. The challenge for anesthesia in this ever-changing world comes back to the physician-patient relationship. As noted in previous articles “The Benefits of Strategy” from the Winter 2012 issue of The Communique and “Planning for Payor Negotiations” from the Spring 2012 issue of The Communique, high deductible health plans (HDHPs) are a growing health insurance product line. This puts a greater emphasis on collecting larger sums of money from the patient. Moreover, the current economic climate has put a strain on the safety nets that are in place to help those with fewer resources. The self-pay category is growing and the need to address this issue is at the forefront in...

By Abby Pendleton, Esq., Carey Kalmowitz, Esq. and Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. The Health Law Partners, P.C., Southfield, MI On June 1, 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (the “OIG”) issued its Advisory Opinion No. 12-06, which provides long-awaited guidance to the health care industry regarding the legal permissibility of an anesthesia delivery service model commonly referred to as the “company model.” Insofar as Advisory Opinion No. 12-06 is the initial OIG guidance that specifically focuses on such an arrangement and determines that the factual paradigms presented implicate risks under the Medicare and Medicaid Antikickback Statute (the “AKS”), this Advisory Opinion understandably is capturing broad attention within the medical and legal communities. While OIG Advisory Opinion 12-06 clarifies the almost-axiomatic observation that company model arrangements, especially those that contain the indicia that the OIG historically has identified as problematic under the AKS, certainly have the potential...

Another Medicare compliance deadline approaches, and it has attracted a fair amount of attention.  The good news is that it will apply to few pain physicians and even fewer anesthesiologists.  Sometimes it is necessary to explain a new rule or requirement just so that our readers know not to worry.  This is one of those times.By July 1, 2012, those physicians and facilities that are affected are expected to be in compliance with the “3-day payment policy.” The 3-day payment window applies to certain outpatient services provided by hospitals and hospitals’ wholly owned or wholly operated entities, including physician practices.The policy has applied to diagnostic services and related non-diagnostic services since 1998.  The Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010 broadened the definition of related non-diagnostic services that are subject to the payment window to include any non-diagnostic service that is clinically related to...

The EHR Incentive Program, often dubbed “Meaningful Use” (MU), has been surrounded by questions and confusion among anesthesiologists and practice administrators since its inception.  Currently, the majority of anesthesiologists and pain physicians are classified as an Eligible Professional (EP) under the Medicare portion of Meaningful Use and most of the public conversation is centered on that program.  However, the Medicaid option offers more flexibility and financial incentive which raises the question, “How does the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program differ from the Medicare portion?”  The major differences between the Medicare and Medicaid programs of Meaningful Use center on:Provider EligibilityProvider EnrollmentFinancial IncentiveAttestation ScheduleProvider Enrollment and Eligibility To be considered a Medicaid EP, an anesthesiologist or pain physician must perform less than 90% of their services in an inpatient setting (POS 21), but also must provide at least 30% of services to Medicaid patients.  According to CMS: Medicaid patients might be fee-for-service encounters where...

The acronym “HIPAA” has become a household name since the enactment of the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which, among other things, established rules for protecting and securing patients’ health information. In fact, it is not uncommon to hear about breaches of patient information costing healthcare providers and suppliers six and seven figure civil monetary penalties or settlements. Typically, such settlements and penalties have arisen out of patient complaints that the privacy of their protected health information (PHI) has been compromised. However, beginning November 2011, patient complaints will not be the only way in which the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) will learn about non-compliant entities.Section 13411 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which established the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, requires the Secretary of HHS to “provide for periodic audits to ensure...