Blog posts tagged in anesthesiologists
One way in which anesthesiologists can add value to their hospitals’ bottom line is by assuming responsibility for the cost of the drugs they order and administer.
The U.S. general anesthesia market size was approximately $2 billion in 2011 and is expected to grow at a moderate rate of 4% annually from 2011 to 2015, according to a Markets and Markets report. In addition, intravenous anesthetic drugs accounted for the largest share—65%—of the U.S. general anesthetics drugs market in 2011. Individual anesthesiology practitioners and groups have little control over total spending on drugs, just as they have little control over annual national spending on anesthesia services, but they can involve themselves in cost management locally, within their own institutions. As with most activities, success starts with knowledge.
First, anesthesiologists should be aware of the large variation in the cost of anesthetic agents and other medications used during the perioperative process. One...
The specialty of anesthesiology is experiencing an unprecedented level of merger activity and practice acquisitions. The idea of two or more practices joining forces to secure their market position or enhance their strategic options is hardly a new phenomenon. The past few decades has seen the emergence of some very large anesthesia organizations that have dramatically changed the landscape in their respective markets. Once a pioneer in large group practice management, the Anesthesia Service Management Group (ASMG) and its 150 plus physicians in San Diego has become a model to emulate and refine. By some accounts, we have already reached a point where fewer than 100 organizations employ more than 15 percent of all anesthesia providers, but this is only a rough calculation, made especially challenging by the recent infusion of venture capital money that is inspiring an impressive list of practice acquisitions across the country. This dramatic rethinking of...
increasingly point to their role in driving down the rate of surgical
site and other hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). Not only does
anesthesiologists’ and nurse anesthetists’ compliance with the relevant
quality measures help the hospitals’ quality scores and satisfy PQRS
requirements, preventing HAIs is good for patients and saves on health
care system costs.
Compliance with quality
standards and improvement upon current scores are often elements in
negotiations with hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers and, more and
more, third-party payers. When it comes to including performance
bonuses in contracts, the principle is sound, but the dollar value has
been elusive. A new study published in the online edition of JAMA
Internal Medicine on September 2, 2013, Health Care-Associated Infections: A Meta-analysis of Costs and Financial Impact on the US Health Care System
by Zimlichman et al. at the Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston,
analyzed the literature and available databases to determine...
On October 1, 2014, the United States health care system will undergo a major transformation. We will transition from the decades-old Ninth Edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) set of diagnosis and inpatient procedure codes to the Tenth Edition of those code sets—or ICD-10. The Tenth Edition is the version currently used by most developed countries throughout the world. ICD-10 allows for greater specificity and detail in describing a patient’s diagnosis and in classifying inpatient procedures, so reimbursement can better reflect the intensity of the patient’s condition and diagnostic needs.
This transition will have a major impact on anyone who uses health care information that contains a diagnosis and/or inpatient procedure code, including hospitals, physicians, other providers, payers, clearinghouses, billing companies, etc.
The change will affect all covered entities as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Covered entities are required to adopt...
There has been substantial growth in the number of ambulatory surgery centers across the United States. With the advancement in technology for non-invasive procedures, and shorter-acting anesthetics, more patients are being seen in the freestanding surgery facility (FSF). However, the trend in patient co-morbidities, i.e., obesity, diabetes, cardiac, and respiratory diseases has also risen, increasing the anesthetic risk even though low risk procedures are performed. The most common malpractice claims have been associated with diagnostic procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with patient co-morbidities as contributing factors. The morbidity and mortality of ambulatory surgery patients has led to an increased concern for patient safety in freestanding facilities. Of particular concern is sedation, specifically in gastroenterology (GI) centers. Yet, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) recently reported that two-thirds of the anesthesia procedures provided during colonoscopies and endoscopies (EGDs) were on “low-risk patients;” suggesting...
These days I hear that term from more and more anesthesia group leaders, and I’m sure that you’re thinking about it more than you’d like.
From the Latin root competitionem, its meaning originated in the sense of rivalry, of a contest for something. Since at least the 1790s, it’s been used to describe rivalry in the marketplace.
Ask yourself what “the competition” means to you. What comes to mind?
In working with anesthesia group leaders across the country, my regular experience is that they envision the competition as another anesthesia group, whether from across the county or across the country. These days, the image that often first comes to mind is that of the predatory staffing-service model.
I certainly can’t fault these group leaders because, especially these days, there is tremendous competitive pressure from outside entities coveting your facility contracts.
So, for most group leaders protecting their practice from...
On January 25, 2013, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) issued its long-awaited Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) final omnibus regulations (Final Rule). The Final Rule modified the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement and Breach Notification Rules (HIPAA Rules) and is comprised of four sub-rules:
Final modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Enforcement Rules mandated by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act;
A final rule adopting changes to the HIPAA Enforcement Rule to incorporate the increased and tiered civil money penalty structure as set forth by HITECH;
A final Breach Notification rule; and
A final rule modifying the Privacy Rule as required by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA).
While the Final Rule is effective March 26, 2013, compliance with the provisions of the Final Rule is not required until September 23, 2013....
There is no doubt that the emergence of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) program is changing the way providers capture documentation on the front end. According to the 2012 NCHS Data Brief, 55 percent of physician groups have already adopted an EHR. Among the 45 percent that have yet to implement an EHR system, nearly half plan to purchase or use a system already purchased this year.1 Hospitals are also purchasing and installing EHRs at a rapid rate.
EHR templates are rapidly gaining footholds despite some growing pains. CMS has issued advice on the use of checkboxes and drop-down menus accommodating discrete data capture. Despite access to such “documentation tools” via point-and-click templates, most physicians are complaining that it takes longer to document an encounter in an EHR than to previously dictate it. The RAND Corporation released a paper describing the phenomenon that occurs when an industry’s technological capabilities improve at...
The anesthesia business, regardless of whether one chooses to define it as the practice of medicine, nursing, or some hybrid, is in the midst of upheaval. Increasing market consolidation, mergers, acquisitions and introduction of private equity funding have made the business of managing anesthesia delivery services increasingly complex. Bear in mind that delivering anesthesia and managing the delivery of anesthesia services are two very different things.
Our unparalleled improvements in patient safety, quality, and, ultimately, morbidity and mortality make us justifiably proud of the specialty’s success and the envy of the rest of health care. One would think that this remarkable history of clinical success would provide stability for the business side of anesthesia practice. After all, the clinical product that we provide is orders of magnitude safer than when I entered the specialty 25 years ago. If anything, however, I believe our advances have actually laid the foundation for the...
Over the New Year holiday, Congress finally passed legislation to stop the U.S. economy from going over the fiscal cliff. The new law included a temporary reprieve from the 26.5 percent cut provided for by the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula. There will be no SGR reduction throughout 2013—a development that lets us all breathe a deep sigh of relief, even though the formula itself, and its future depredations, are still in the law. Medicare payments to physicians and hospitals are not inviolate for the coming year, it must be noted: automatic two-percent reductions will hit Medicare as part of the “sequestration” process just two months from now if Congress and the White House do not reach another deal.
For many anesthesia practices, the runup to negotiations with hospitals and payers is a cliffhanger—indeed, even contemplating future negotiations often feels precarious. Last year, one of the national anesthesia practice management...
I am an anesthesiologist. The leadership of my small group of 15 physicians has been negotiating a merger with the large group in a nearby city. They have made some compelling arguments for the strategic advantages of an affiliation with a larger entity. But as logical as the rationale for merging is, so are the concerns and the questions raised by detractors. It is just not clear that all the disruption of closing out our current entity and transitioning to employment status with the big group will result in a more favorable situation for us as individuals or even as a division of the new entity. I personally worry about losing control of my practice and the clinical autonomy that attracted me to this practice in the first place. The fact is that I am still unsure how I will vote when we all get together to make a final...
Noah Rosenberg, M.D.Resident, Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Fred E. Shapiro, D.O.Assistant Professor of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, ISOBS Founder
The Institute for Safety in Office-Based Surgery (ISOBS), an independent, non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, has developed a safety checklist for use in the office-based setting. A recent study to be published in the journal ePlastydemonstrated a more than 75% reduction in the number of surgical complications with use of the ISOBS Safety Checklist (see below for citation). While this positive effect on surgical complications validates much of the data already collected in the inpatient setting, it also clearly emphasizes the need for a tailored patient safety approach to the office-based setting. For that reason, ISOBS has developed a second checklist for use by patients to engage them in office-based surgical safety.
The ISOBS Patient Checklist (ISOBS PC) contains a number of questions...
“Much has changed in health
care since HIPAA was enacted over fifteen years ago,” said HHS Secretary
Kathleen Sebelius in the Department of Health and Human Services’
January 17th press release announcing the publication of the
long-awaited final omnibus rule with Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy,
Security, Enforcement and Breach Notification Rules under the Health
Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. “The new rule will help
protect patient privacy and safeguard patients’ health information in an
ever expanding digital age.”
The final omnibus rule will
go into effect on March 26, 2013. Covered entities such as anesthesia
and pain medicine practices and billing companies including ABC—and
their business associates—must be in compliance by September 23, 2013.
The final rule changes HIPAA in several important ways:
It toughens the definition and consequences of failure to notify affected parties of security and privacy breaches;It strengthens...
The 2013 CPT®
Changes and Codebook are now available to health care providers.
Overall, the 2013 changes include 186 new codes, 119 deleted codes, and
263 revised codes. In addition CPT revised 18 modifiers and updated 150
guidelines. The very good news for anesthesia and pain management
providers is only a small handful of these changes directly impact the
services they routinely provide. Following are general comments
regarding the 2013 changes:
No Anesthesia codes were deleted, revised, or added for 2013.Pain management providers should take note of the four revised codes
and one new code in the nervous system section of CPT 2013. The
majority of changes occur in the denervation subsection, where CPT
revised codes 64612 and 64614 and added 64615 for bilateral
chemodenervation of muscles innervated by the facial, trigeminal,
cervical spinal and accessory nerves.CPT also changed the parenthetical note for code 76942, ultrasound
guidance for needle placement (eg,...
MEDICARE PAYMENTS AFTER DECEMBER 31st
If we go into the New Year without
legislation to stop the economy from going over the fiscal cliff—as
appears almost certain—there will be no just-in-time SGR fix either.
The Medicare conversion factor applicable to services provided from
January 1st onwards will be 26.5% lower, unless and until Congress
corrects the problem. Since the earliest that Medicare will pay claims
will be January 14th, however, there is time for Congress to take the
necessary action and prevent any remittances from going out at the lower
rate, subject to later adjustment. It is instructive to look at a
six-year history of the dates on which Congress passed legislation each
year avoiding the impact of the SGR (American Medical News, December 24,
2006-4.4%0.2%Feb. 8, 2006*
2007-5%0%Dec. 20, 2006
2008 (Jan.–June)-10.1%0.5%Dec. 29, 2007
2008 (July–Dec.)-10.6%0%July 15, 2008*
2010 (Jan.–Feb.)-21.3%0%Dec. 19, 2009
2010 March-21.3%0%March 2, 2010*
[Author’s Note: A version of this article originally appeared in the August 2012 issue of Anesthesiology News.]
In a much awaited pronouncement, on June 1, 2012, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General issued Advisory Opinion 12-06 addressing the propriety of two popular schemes to extract money from anesthesiologists, the so-called “company model” and the purported “management fee.”
The advisory opinion could not be more welcome: Just as Willie Sutton, the bank robber, targeted banks “because that’s where the money is,” owners of ambulatory surgery centers continue seek a share of anesthesia fees.
According to a survey conducted by the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 41% of the responding anesthesia practices (125 out of 308) reported being requested by an ASC or its referring physician practice to adopt a company model. Not surprisingly, those 125 practices reported that out of the total 332 requests to participate in...
The acronym “HIPAA” has become a household name since the enactment of the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which, among other things, established rules for protecting and securing patients’ health information. In fact, it is not uncommon to hear about breaches of patient information costing healthcare providers and suppliers six and seven figure civil monetary penalties or settlements. Typically, such settlements and penalties have arisen out of patient complaints that the privacy of their protected health information (PHI) has been compromised. However, beginning November 2011, patient complaints will not be the only way in which the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) will learn about non-compliant entities.Section 13411 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which established the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, requires the Secretary of HHS to “provide for periodic audits to ensure...
Many, if not most, anesthesia practices provide services at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) as well as at hospitals. Some 11 percent of anesthesiologists have invested in the ASC as part owners, according to Medscape’sAnesthesiology Compensation Report: 2011 Results. Others invest their energy in contracts to staff ASCs. In either case, it is important to know the economic condition and value of one’s ASC.One way to approach the matter is to analyze the attractiveness of the ASC to a buyer. Buyers tend to invest in outpatient facilities with room for improvement in performance. Whether you are considering buying (or selling) an ownership share or entering into or renewing an exclusive contract, the ASC’s appeal to a potential corporate investor such as an ASC management company is relevant.Becker’s ASC Review E-Weekly ran an article with “10 Questions to Evaluate ASC Investment Opportunities” in its June 16, 2012 issue. Outpatient Surgery Magazine alerted subscribers to a 2009...
Another Medicare compliance deadline approaches, and it has attracted a fair amount of attention. The good news is that it will apply to few pain physicians and even fewer anesthesiologists. Sometimes it is necessary to explain a new rule or requirement just so that our readers know not to worry. This is one of those times.By July 1, 2012, those physicians and facilities that are affected are expected to be in compliance with the “3-day payment policy.” The 3-day payment window applies to certain outpatient services provided by hospitals and hospitals’ wholly owned or wholly operated entities, including physician practices.The policy has applied to diagnostic services and related non-diagnostic services since 1998. The Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010 broadened the definition of related non-diagnostic services that are subject to the payment window to include any non-diagnostic service that is clinically related to...
On-time case starts can make the difference between profitable and unprofitable operating rooms. There are multiple causes for late starts, among them clinical complications, unavailable instruments or supplies, unavailable laboratory reports or other paperwork, delays in room turnover and late arrivals on the part of surgeons, patients, and yes, anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists.
Almost all of the problems listed above are within the control of the anesthesiology group in charge of managing the OR. A June 14th Outpatient Surgery Tip of the Day (www.outpatientsurgery.net) republished four tips to incentivize surgeons and anesthesiologists to arrive on time for scheduled cases. These tips originally appeared in the November 2010 issue of Outpatient Surgery. The article by Dan O’Connor was directed to readers who manage both types of physician, but the strategies can be implemented (or at least proposed) by a practice that provides an anesthesiologist-medical director.
Tip No. 1: Make wake-up calls. An...